Micro.blog has always stubbornly stuck to static-site generation (first Jekyll, then Hugo) and probably always will, even as there is a lot more complexity layered on top. There’s just something future-proof about having a folder of HTML files. We need to better expose this foundation, not hide it.

Numeric Citizen

agree. Not everyone will catch the meaning of "data portability" and what it means for the future of digital content, but it's certainly something unique to Micro.blog.

Luke M. Perez

Preach!

Boris Mann

speaking of which, rather than the archive format, the raw Markdown + assets would be more useful to me.

We talked about this years ago. I know you want to make a standard, but for more technical users, the “source” would be better and immediately usable.

Martin De Wulf

even the feed here on micro.blog? That seems surprising!

Evan Hildreth

I’m (over-engineering!) an event-sourced data model for my project with the express intent of making static generation easier. HTML in a folder is a solved problem, so let’s use it!

Miles Metcalfe

You say stubborn, I say principled.

Andrew Haglund

@manton even things like each users timeline? If so that blows my mind.

(I found a post you wrote in 2021 to learn more. I just started a blog with Eleventy so all this stuff is new to me!)

Manton Reece

@boris I think we can do both. You can export the raw Markdown as a folder already, but then have to grab the images from the .bar file. There could be another option that has both together.

Manton Reece

@haglund Oh, not the timelines. Just everything at someone’s hosted blog.

Pedro Corá

I said it already, you run the most affordable and nicest managed hugo host that exists!

jden :prami:

@manton keep it that way. It’s a major selling point compared to something like Ghost.

Alex LaFroscia

@manton I really
love this about the service, but it’s been tricky to debug as I explore migrating my personal site over. Back-porting posts has been a pain and some are showing up twice. It would be nice to have more ways to interact with the static generation process; forcing a rebuild, nuking the cache, etc

Manton Reece

@alexlafroscia Thanks! I agree. Just in case you didn't know, you can clear the cache and force a rebuild with Account → View logs → Rebuild. If you're still seeing duplicates, send us an email too.

Alex LaFroscia

@manton that is VERY good to know! I really want to migrate my site over but was stuck on this. I appreciate the tip!

Boris Mann

as long as the images have the same path structure and can be decompressed into an asset folder that the markdown points to, that’s fine.

Manton Reece

@jonah Thanks!

Manton Reece @manton
Lightbox Image