I’m not one to impulsively cancel subscriptions when I disagree with the leadership or when there’s a misstep, but I’m really starting to question sticking with The New York Times. It’s not a partisan thing. Their coverage feels weak in all the moments when we need it to be exceptional.

they are a broadcast channel for whatever agenda their advertisers support, like most news outlets these days… It’s a sorry state of affairs. I trust Aljazeera more than most American news sources these days.

@pratik I mean, this has been the primary journalism business model for… their whole existance? I’m not sure it’s any different now. I think their articles are still (usually) really solid. I mostly avoid their rage/anxiety-inducing Op-ed section.

I ditched them for WaPo a few years ago. It has always felt like the right move.

Not to mention their years long tendency towards tranphobic morsl panic (wrapped up in ‘respectable’ rethoric and ‘concerns’).

@manton Not to mention that of all the tv, software and media subscriptions I have, it is the most expensive of all at $27 every four weeks. My wife likes the puzzles and the food and feature coverage is top notch but the journalism is suffering from some weirdness for sure.

@pratik unfortunately, no newspaper of scale and notoriety prices its subscriptions high enough to make a profit (or break even), so they still run ads, and therefore all of them are businesses who want to increase readership to increase ad views. I agree, tho, if you don’t like an editorial board, you should not support them.

I’ve been on the fence since I don’t read nearly as much as I think I will, and this latest nonsense pushed me over the line and I pulled the plug
